I agree, the bold sentence is a main conclusion, it is also the beginning of the argument.
The author states that the proposal to change the vacation is being opposed - the author reveals to us what is the reason of the opposition. It is being oppo…
Hi @"Juliet --Student Service--" could you please advise how I can upgrade my subscription? I am trying to purchase a yearly package but get the message "Sorry, you cannot purchase a new subscription because you already have an active subscription.O…
I would analyse the incorrect answers you picked and compare/contrast it with the correct one while looking at the whole argument. Write down couple of those questions and see if you can find a pattern, the way authors came to the right answer. What…
Focus on conclusion and find an answer choice that will weaken it, by stating that it is not the case that X is Y. Not attacking the conclusion itself but attacking the support. Like introducing something new or emphasizing some point that will make…
@Sami I am dealing with the same issue: I just need to reaffirm something. In the sentence.
If you cannot swim you are not a Koala Bear. - cannot group 4 indicator and not- is a negative for Koala. In Lawgic it would be S then K right? Thanks in ad…
Thanks, could you please explain how you got to /S then /K.
I thought when we have a group indicator, it is not treated as a negative so in the sentence-
"If you cannot swim you are not a Koala." It would be S for swim, then take cannot as a grou…